<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Understanding Lead Pigment Litigation</title>
<link>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/</link>
<description>Understanding Lead Pigment Litigation</description>
<item>
<title>Statement on California Supreme Court Decision on Contingency Fee issue in Santa Clara case</title>
<link>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=11560</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:39:18 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=11560</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sherwin-Williams Statement on Denial of Post-Trial Motions in Gaines</title>
<link>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=165</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=165</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sherwin-Williams Files Post Verdict Motions in Gaines Case</title>
<link>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=164</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:40:04 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=164</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Statement on Wisconsin Supreme Court Opinion on Lead Pigment Litigation</title>
<link>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=163</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:30:27 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=163</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Statement by Charles H. Moellenberg, Jr., of Jones Day, representing the Sherwin-Williams Company on the verdict in Gaines v. Sherwin-Williams Co:</title>
<link>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=162</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:50:32 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.leadlawsuits.com/index.php?s=686&amp;item=162</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
